European Union
A rule written for one market became a property of the tool everyone else uses
Brussels wrote AI transparency rules for its own market. The mark now travels with the tool everywhere, and the people it reaches had no part in either decision. The objection is jurisdictional, not to the rule.
Claude's content mark shows that a model touched a text, not whether it supplied the argument
Claude's new mark can show that a model touched a text. It cannot tell whether the model supplied the argument, or only the English through which the argument had to travel.
Estonia is committing to buy AI compute that no supplier has built yet
Britain used procurement to open its digital market, and 90% of G-Cloud's suppliers are SMEs taking 44% of the money. Estonia is trying the harder version, a forward purchase commitment to attract a supplier that is not there yet.
Lots of procurement, limited learning
Federal agencies doubled their AI buying and kept no record of what they learned.
Summer in Europe while you can: AI and the Jevons paradox might soon make it unbearable
Biometrics lowered the administrative cost of designing new entry requirements, which removed the natural brake on regulatory ambition. The efficiency gain was immediately consumed by the expanded scope of what became feasible to demand.
Europe regulates the digital world and keeps tripping in the physical one
I just came back from Frankfurt, and I spent an unhealthy amount of time talking about digital policies while looking at stairs.
The GDPR review, and what gets traded for competitiveness
So, the European Union is reviewing parts of the GDPR to make it more compatible with innovation and competitiveness.